RCGA picked the perfect site for 2009 Open.
Thursday, September 6th, 2007
TED BITS, Ted McIntyre –Glen Abbey the perfect spot for Open.
Glen Abbey the perfect site for Canadian Open
Most of the Canadian golf media enjoy bashing the decisions of the Royal Canadian Golf Association because, well, it’s an easy target. Let’s face it, the RCGA doesn’t have the greatest track record in turning out top professional players despite the historic record popularity of the game in Canada—there’s not a single female player with a hope of winning an LPGA Tour event in the foreseeable future, and Mike Weir’s best days would appear to be well behind him, with no homegrown talent waiting to take his place among the Tour’s top 50. Meanwhile, the RCGA’s showcase event, the Canadian Open, is such a difficult marketing sell that it remains without a title sponsor.
However, I give the RCGA credit for making the wise—if not hugely popular—decision of going back to Glen Abbey for both 2008 and 2009 (predicted here almost two months ago). Say what you want about how much some Tour players apparently hate the Abbey, but I have never met a single player who bypassed the Open just because it was in Oakville, Ontario, and not somewhere else. On the contrary, I have heard many a player tell the RCGA that they’re taking the week off because they don’t like the course, only to not show up the following year at a different venue. In other words, it’s not the course; it’s just a good excuse.
Jim Furyk is the exception. After hearing about how stunning Hamilton G&CC was, he showed up there last year and won. He would never have shown up at Angus Glen in July had he not been defending champion, and he may well have bypassed the Abbey next year as well had he not made the mistake of winning again, which will force him into the same brutal schedule next year—unable to take the one week off he really needs in the midst of the run from the British Open to the Ryder Cup. (I predict right now that Furyk is stricken with some flu-like ailment immediately following the British Open next year.)
However, short of going back to Hamilton–which the club members wouldn’t agree to anyway after just surrendering their course for the second time in four years—where else would make a good financial and practical decision for the RCGA? I guarantee Tiger, Ernie and Phil don’t come to either Royal Montreal or Shaughnessy at the other end of the country. The field will not be affected one way or the other.
Besides, as anyone who has been to the Abbey in the past year will attest, it’s in the best shape it’s seen in almost a generation. It’s also improving with age as once seedling trees mature to better define fairways.
So it’s now a simple case of what makes financial sense—not a dumb starting point considering how dire the situation is for those caretakers of Canada’s most important golf championship—the one that drives and funds amateur golf programs throughout the nation. The RCGA will get a pile more spectators through the gates at Glen Abbey—a place specifically designed as a model tournament venue for fans–than they will at any other course in Canada. They also have a long history of running marble-smooth events there. And like it or not, they’re also in the centre of the universe when it comes to gaining Canadian media attention, which they also desperately need to peddle this puppy.
This is not the time to make bold, experimental moves. This is the time to take stock of your bank account and make careful, prudent moves that you are confident will leave you in the black when all is said and done.
Having a Canadian Open rota of classic courses in the near future is all fine and good—assuming enough can be found that can logistically host the tournament. But let’s make sure we have a PGA Tour event that’s still afloat to take to those various ports of call.



